Guess Who Leads the Bribery World?
The USA is the most corrupt country in the world and I have 10,000 posts that point heavily to that fact…

AP Sources: Dem lawmakers may drop millionaire tax December 15, 2011


December 14, 2011

by legitgov

ShareThis

Democratic surrendering sociopaths alert: AP Sources: Dem lawmakers may drop millionaire tax 14 Dec 2011 DemocRATic lawmakers are considering whether to jettison their demand for a millionaires’ surtax, which they had hoped to use to cover the cost of a Social Security payroll tax cut extension for millions of wage-earners, officials said Wednesday. If party leaders go ahead, it would mark a(nother) concession to Republicans in the year-end standoff over the tax cut extension that President Barack Obama requested and leaders in both parties say they want. The disclosure came as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other leading Democrats went to the White House to meet with Obama. [LOL, *of course!*]

Comments (0)

Steven Chu to defend Solyndra loan before Congress panel November 17, 2011

TheUS Energy Department did its homework on a $535 million loan guarantee it gave to the now bankrupt solar panel maker Solyndra, the energy secretary, Steven Chu, plans to tell lawmakers at a hearing on Thursday.

Republicans are expected to grill Chu on taxpayer-funded aid to Solyndra, using as evidence emails from government officials and investors that they say show the loan was rushed, poorly supervised and ill-advisedly restructured.

Chu’s prepared remarks for the House of Representatives energy and commerce committee show he plans to stand firm on the Obama administration‘s strategy of investing in clean energy.

“The loan guarantee to Solyndra was subject to proper, rigorous scrutiny and healthy debate during every phase of the process,” according to his testimony.

“When it comes to the clean energy race, America faces a simple choice: compete or accept defeat. I believe we can and must compete,” Chu said, urging Congress to continue to finance renewable energy projects.

In his remarks, he took ownership of final decisions on the aid to Solyndra and denied deciding anything about the loan guarantee “based on political considerations”.

Investigators have gathered more than 250,000 pages of documents about Solyndra and conducted hours of interviews over the past nine months. Chu is the most senior government official to appear before the House committee.

Democratic lawmakers plan to knock down the Republican arguments, according to a staff memo released on Wednesday that includes a third-party legal opinion confirming the loan restructuring was permissible.

The opinion was prepared by Mary Anne Sullivan of the law firm Hogan Lovells, who was the Energy Department’s general counsel during the Clinton administration.

Lawmakers have complained Solyndra talked of rosy financial forecasts just before it ran out of cash. The FBI raided Solyndra’s offices after it filed for bankruptcy, although little is known about that probe.

Last week, the Energy Department gave lawmakers a copy of a letter from a supplier who said Solyndra had sought to postpone payments to show “a higher-than-actual cash position to the US government,” according to the Democratic staff memo.

The memo did not include a copy of the letter but Democrats said “questions may be raised” whether the Energy Department responded appropriately.

Emails provided to Reuters show a loan programme official referred the fraud complaint to the Solyndra lawyer Ben Schwartz in March 2010, asking him to “just send us whatever you have from your end, and we’ll put it in the file … No further action required.”

The department official did not follow up on that request for seven months, until the company was running out of cash and sought to restructure its loan, emails showed.

“I don’t mean to be a pest but can you send us an email indicating the result of your internal investigation of whether subsequent to Nov 2009, Solyndra withheld payment to suppliers to improve its cash position,” the loan official asked.

Schwartz replied in a memo dated 4 November 2010, saying Solyndra officials found no evidence to support the complaint. Schwartz argued that even if the allegations were true, “such actions would not constitute fraudulent activity”.

Republicans have raised questions about whether decisions were made to help George Kaiser, a major investor in Solyndra and a fundraiser for the successful presidential election campaign of Barack Obama in 2008.

“I want to be clear: over the course of Solyndra’s loan guarantee, I did not make any decision based on political considerations,” Chu said in his prepared remarks.

Democratic lawmakers said key department officials were unaware of Kaiser’s connections and noted David Frantz, the director of the loan programme, told investigators he had never heard of Kaiser until media reports about Solyndra.

When Solyndra struggled with cash flow in October 2010 and Goldman Sachs failed to find new private funding to keep it going, Kaiser’s advisers were unsure whether plowing in more money was a good idea, emails provided by Republicans showed.

Solyndra wanted to announce some layoffs on28 October 2010, but postponed the bad news until after the 2 November congressional elections, according to emails from Argonaut Private Equity, which manages Kaiser’s investments.

“The DOE has requested a delay until after the election (without mentioning the election),” unidentified Argonaut officials wrote in one of three emails about the delay.

A Department of Energy spokesman dismissed the allegation, saying documents it provided show “decisions about this loan were made on the merits.”

In December 2010, the department suggested a restructuring plan that saw $75m from Argonaut and another private investors ranked ahead of the government in the event of bankruptcy, the new emails showed.

“I struggle to recommend making the additional investment,” Steve Mitchell, managing director of Argonaut, wrote to Kaiser, noting the deal would give Solyndra some time to see if it could improve sagging sales.

Chu said the plan gave taxpayers a chance to recover the loan, even though it meant some debt would be subordinated.

“The department faced a difficult decision: force the company into immediate bankruptcy or restructure the loan guarantee,” he said.

When the company ran out of money again, the department looked at options for support but decided more help “was not in the taxpayer’s best interests”, Chu said.

Comments (0)

FEMA Shutdown Showdown Might Solve Itself September 27, 2011

A brewing standoff and possible government shutdown may end up solving itself. According to the Washington Post, the Federal Emergency Management Agency may be able to stay open with its current funding until the end of the week, meaning it would get to October 1, the beginning of the 2012 fiscal year.

How would this solve the problem? The possibility of a government shutdown arose when the parties butted heads over whether additional funding for FEMA, to help pay for relief due to Hurricane Irene, should be offset with spending cuts elsewhere in the budget. Democrats say no, Republicans say yes, and neither party shows any sign of budging. But the parties are mostly in agreement about how much money FEMA should get in the new fiscal year. The spending limits put into place by this summer’s debt ceiling deal include funding for disasters, and the continuing resolution which the House approved includes $2.65 billion in disaster funding reflecting that agreement. The conflict lay in the possibility of FEMA running out of cash before the new fiscal year, and Congress having to pony up to bridge the gap. If the agency can survive until Friday, the issue would be moot and the House could presumably pass a noncontroversial continuing resolution to keep the government open until full year appropriations are mad.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

But it’s not quite time to breathe a sigh of relief yet. First of all, there’s some skepticism on the Hill that FEMA really could make it throughout the week without additional funding. It’s also not clear whether the party leaders will allow this to change their strategy, or push ahead with their current bills. The Senate is still set to vote on a Democratic bill, which does not include offsets, this evening. Democratic lawmakers are scrambling to convince enough Republican moderates to push the bill beyond the crucial 60-vote threshold needed to pass the Senate. If it does pass, then its future would be unclear, as House Republicans are sticking to the bill which they passed through that chamber last week, and includes offsets.

Comments (0)